new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 59/100, with Enter 52/100, Hold 67/100, and Exit 14/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #23 of 283 raydium-amm pools, the pool is being assessed as a hold rather than a clear new entry or immediate exit, consistent with fee-funded yield but uncertain memecoin and lifecycle risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, fee APR collapses, or USELESS liquidity deteriorates; it could strengthen if fee activity persists while liquidity and exit conditions remain stable.
Computed 2026-07-13 23:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
TVL help
$2.19M
Total value locked
APR help
13.7%
advertised≈ 18.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)Daily Volume help
$323.72K
Trailing 24h
My Deposit
AI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit trigger: withdraw if pool TVL falls materially from $2.2M or if fee generation no longer supports 12.9% after a sustained volume decline. Because recent range data is unavailable, use a smaller initial allocation and review the position after each material SOL-to-USELESS price move rather than assuming passive exposure is suitable.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 13.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 12.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $323.72K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $809.31 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 12.9% fee APR and 0.9% reward APR. Fee sustainability is 94%, so the current stated return does not depend on an active reward stream; reward dependency remains unconfirmed. The fee return is therefore sensitive to changes in swap volume and liquidity, rather than to a published emissions schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss reporting and tick-range exposure are unavailable, so this pool does not currently provide a measured basis for estimating either effect. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-USELESS carries substantial risk of price divergence between SOL and USELESS, which can increase inventory imbalance and withdrawal losses. Lifecycle and persistence are also unknown, making emission decay and exit timing difficult to model; an LP should not assume current fee activity will persist.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than USELESS. A rise or fall in SOL relative to USELESS changes the pool's inventory mix and can leave the LP holding more of the asset that underperforms after arbitrage.
tollUSELESS Context
USELESS is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to have materially less external liquidity than SOL. Sharp USELESS price moves, thin exit liquidity, or a loss of market interest can increase divergence losses and make the LP's fee income less reliable as an offset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and USELESS into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the asset that has fallen in price, and memecoin prices can make that loss significant.
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-USELESS liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and USELESS into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the asset that has fallen in price, and memecoin prices can make that loss significant.
Details
Solana
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Q2sPHPdUWFMg7M7wwrQKLrn619cAucfRsmhVJffodSp
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- USELESS (Dz9mQ9Nz…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Non-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardFrequently Asked Questions
Current reward APR is 0.9% and fee APR is 12.9%, so the stated return is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward component would fall, while fee income would still depend on trading activity.
Current reward APR is 0.9% and fee APR is 12.9%, so the stated return is currently fee-based rather than emission-based. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward component would fall, while fee income would still depend on trading activity.
The current reward component is 0.9%, so expiration of incentives would not remove the stated reward contribution at present. The remaining return would be the 12.9% fee APR, subject to changes in volume, TVL, and fee distribution.
The current reward component is 0.9%, so expiration of incentives would not remove the stated reward contribution at present. The remaining return would be the 12.9% fee APR, subject to changes in volume, TVL, and fee distribution.
Risk is high because SOL has deeper external liquidity while USELESS can experience sharp price moves or weak exits. The pool has $2.2M in liquidity, $324K in recent volume, and a fee-funded total APR of 13.7%, but those figures do not eliminate divergence loss or token-specific risk.
Risk is high because SOL has deeper external liquidity while USELESS can experience sharp price moves or weak exits. The pool has $2.2M in liquidity, $324K in recent volume, and a fee-funded total APR of 13.7%, but those figures do not eliminate divergence loss or token-specific risk.
Use objective triggers such as a material decline from $2.2M, sustained weakening in 0.15x, or a collapse in 12.9%. For SOL-USELESS, also reassess after a sharp USELESS move, because the resulting inventory imbalance may be more important than the quoted APR.
Use objective triggers such as a material decline from $2.2M, sustained weakening in 0.15x, or a collapse in 12.9%. For SOL-USELESS, also reassess after a sharp USELESS move, because the resulting inventory imbalance may be more important than the quoted APR.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fees are variable. In principle, cumulative fee income at 12.9% must exceed the position's divergence loss; the quoted 13.7% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fees are variable. In principle, cumulative fee income at 12.9% must exceed the position's divergence loss; the quoted 13.7% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
