new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 57/100, with Enter at 52/100, Hold at 64/100, and Exit at 17/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #10 of 283 raydium-amm pools; this supports retaining an existing position selectively rather than treating the score as a blanket entry signal. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, fee-only APR collapses, or ALCH liquidity deteriorates; it would strengthen if fee generation persists with stable liquidity and narrower realized price divergence.
Computed 2026-07-13 23:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
TVL help
$2.25M
Total value locked
APR help
16.0%
advertised≈ -62.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)Daily Volume help
$1.32M
Trailing 24h
My Deposit
AI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current SOL-ALCH price and review the position whenever price approaches either boundary; rebalance or exit if ALCH volatility pushes the position out of range or if fee generation no longer compensates for the added memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 16.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 14.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.32M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.30K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 14.8% from trading fees and 1.2% from rewards, with 93% of yield sourced from fees. Current rewards do not contribute to the quoted APR, so emission decay is not presently reducing the reward component; any future incentive program would need to be evaluated for duration and persistence.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so current price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-ALCH carries substantial directional, liquidity, and exit-timing risk in ALCH; emission decay matters if incentives are added later, while the absence of current rewards means there is no emission cushion against declining fees. An exit plan should account for thinner liquidity during a memecoin selloff.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than ALCH. SOL price moves change the pool's inventory balance and can create impermanent loss relative to holding SOL, while SOL's broader liquidity generally makes rebalancing and exiting less constrained than for ALCH.
tollALCH Context
ALCH is the pool's memecoin exposure and is likely to determine much of its tail risk and exit liquidity. A sharp ALCH move against SOL can increase impermanent loss and shift the LP toward the weaker asset, while declining ALCH volume can reduce fee generation even if nominal TVL remains stable.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALCH into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amount and value of your two assets can change unevenly, especially because ALCH is a memecoin.
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ALCH liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ALCH into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amount and value of your two assets can change unevenly, especially because ALCH is a memecoin.
Details
Solana
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FyDF3vKQFbcvNTsBi7L7LremrFPmXKbQqgAgnPg1hXXd
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ALCH (HNg5PYJm…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Non-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardFrequently Asked Questions
The current SOL-ALCH reward-only APR is 1.2%, so present APR is not dependent on emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce that reward component while 14.8% would still depend on trading activity.
The current SOL-ALCH reward-only APR is 1.2%, so present APR is not dependent on emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce that reward component while 14.8% would still depend on trading activity.
Because the current reward-only APR is 1.2% and fee sustainability is 93%, the quoted yield is currently fee-funded rather than incentive-funded. If future incentives expire, LP income would fall by the reward component, while fees would continue only if trading volume supports them.
Because the current reward-only APR is 1.2% and fee sustainability is 93%, the quoted yield is currently fee-funded rather than incentive-funded. If future incentives expire, LP income would fall by the reward component, while fees would continue only if trading volume supports them.
The main risks are ALCH price collapse, reduced ALCH exit liquidity, and impermanent loss relative to holding SOL. The pool's 0.59x volume-to-liquidity ratio also indicates that deposited liquidity is not being turned over rapidly enough to assume strong fee protection against those risks.
The main risks are ALCH price collapse, reduced ALCH exit liquidity, and impermanent loss relative to holding SOL. The pool's 0.59x volume-to-liquidity ratio also indicates that deposited liquidity is not being turned over rapidly enough to assume strong fee protection against those risks.
For SOL-ALCH, consider exiting when ALCH liquidity deteriorates, price approaches or breaks the selected range, or fee generation falls below the return required for the position's risk. A material TVL drain or sustained decline in volume relative to 0.59x would also weaken the case for remaining in the pool.
For SOL-ALCH, consider exiting when ALCH liquidity deteriorates, price approaches or breaks the selected range, or fee generation falls below the return required for the position's risk. A material TVL drain or sustained decline in volume relative to 0.59x would also weaken the case for remaining in the pool.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the quoted APR is not a guarantee. At 14.8% fee APR, nominal fee recovery would take a multi-year period before accounting for ALCH price divergence, range management, compounding, and transaction costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the quoted APR is not a guarantee. At 14.8% fee APR, nominal fee recovery would take a multi-year period before accounting for ALCH price divergence, range management, compounding, and transaction costs.
