new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 88/100 gives this pool an Enter score of 89/100, Hold score of 88/100, and Exit score of 11/100, with the live verdict ENTER. The ai_engine=enter driver and rank of #7 of 338 meteora-dlmm pools indicate that the current combination of fee production, liquidity, and observed conditions screens favorably within this protocol, not that the position is insulated from memecoin risk. The assessment would change if TVL drains, trading volume contracts, fee APR collapses, ANSEM becomes persistently one-sided, or the pool's execution conditions deteriorate.
Computed 2026-07-13 23:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
TVL help
$2.36M
Total value locked
APR help
500.0%
advertisedDaily Volume help
$11.91M
Trailing 24h
My Deposit
AI Verdict
Deploy Capital
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined review trigger: if daily volume falls below $2.4M for two consecutive sessions, reassess or exit rather than treating the headline fee rate as durable. If the interface permits range management, keep the position narrow enough to match observed trading prices and rebalance when price leaves that range, accepting that a memecoin trend can make a narrow range one-sided quickly.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 381.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $11.91M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $25.34K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 381.6% fee APR and 118.4% reward APR. 76% of yield comes from trading fees, so the quoted return depends on realized swap activity rather than a reward budget. Reward duration is not established, and the reward dependency classification is unknown; fee income should therefore be evaluated against actual volume, liquidity changes, and the possibility of a sharp decline in memecoin trading.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and a seven-day tick-in-range reading are not available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, ANSEM-SOL has elevated exposure to rapid price moves, liquidity withdrawal, and one-sided inventory after a large trend. Emission decay is not the current source of stated yield, but any future incentive program would require checking its schedule and exit timing; an LP should not assume that a fee rate observed during a trading spike will persist.
tollANSEM Context
ANSEM is the memecoin side of this pair and is the main source of idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here; a sharp ANSEM move can leave the LP holding more ANSEM after fees fail to offset the relative price change, while weak external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established settlement asset in the pair, but it still determines half of the LP's inventory and can move independently of ANSEM. SOL's broader ecosystem liquidity may support exit execution, yet this pool's realized fees depend on traders continuing to route ANSEM-SOL swaps rather than using another venue.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls relative to the other, and the value can be lower than simply holding both tokens.
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ANSEM-SOL liquidity pool on meteora-dlmm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls relative to the other, and the value can be lower than simply holding both tokens.
Details
Solana
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6e7V9eegCHw997T72MxgwwJipZ6GJyZF8NvjkzT1rvpN
- Protocol
- meteora-dlmm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- ANSEM (9cRCn9rG…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/1/2026
Non-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardFrequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 118.4%, while the fee-only component is 381.6% and fee sustainability is 76%. Emission decay is therefore not the stated driver of current yield, but any future rewards could decline as their schedule progresses, leaving trading fees as the remaining source.
The current reward-only component is 118.4%, while the fee-only component is 381.6% and fee sustainability is 76%. Emission decay is therefore not the stated driver of current yield, but any future rewards could decline as their schedule progresses, leaving trading fees as the remaining source.
Because the current reward-only APR is 118.4%, the quoted return is already represented as fee-driven rather than incentive-driven. If incentives are introduced and later expire, LP income would depend on swap fees, which can fall if ANSEM-SOL volume or liquidity declines; no dated incentive runway is established here.
Because the current reward-only APR is 118.4%, the quoted return is already represented as fee-driven rather than incentive-driven. If incentives are introduced and later expire, LP income would depend on swap fees, which can fall if ANSEM-SOL volume or liquidity declines; no dated incentive runway is established here.
The main risks are a rapid ANSEM price move, one-sided inventory, uncertain recent range behavior, and a decline in trading activity. Fee sustainability is 76%, but that describes the source of the stated yield, not protection against price loss or a fall in future volume.
The main risks are a rapid ANSEM price move, one-sided inventory, uncertain recent range behavior, and a decline in trading activity. Fee sustainability is 76%, but that describes the source of the stated yield, not protection against price loss or a fall in future volume.
Use a predefined trigger tied to this pool: reassess if daily volume remains below $2.4M for two consecutive sessions, if TVL contracts materially, or if price leaves your managed range and the resulting inventory becomes predominantly ANSEM. Exit timing should also account for whether realized fees are still compensating for the position's price divergence.
Use a predefined trigger tied to this pool: reassess if daily volume remains below $2.4M for two consecutive sessions, if TVL contracts materially, or if price leaves your managed range and the resulting inventory becomes predominantly ANSEM. Exit timing should also account for whether realized fees are still compensating for the position's price divergence.
There is no reliable fixed break-even time because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee APR changes with volume. The theoretical annualized fee figure is 381.6%, but actual break-even depends on realized fees, the path of ANSEM relative to SOL, range management, and exit costs.
There is no reliable fixed break-even time because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee APR changes with volume. The theoretical annualized fee figure is 381.6%, but actual break-even depends on realized fees, the path of ANSEM relative to SOL, range management, and exit costs.
