new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 84/100 and its Enter 81/100 / Hold 87/100 / Exit 11/100 components support a live ENTER rather than a clear entry signal. The pool ranks #87 of 338 meteora-dlmm pools, and the ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the aggregate assessment favors monitoring an existing position over adding aggressively. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, the fee APR collapsed, volume fell materially relative to liquidity, or ANSEM price movement made the position difficult to keep in range; sustained fee volume and stable liquidity would support the current view.
Computed 2026-07-14 01:43 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
TVL help
$50.03K
Total value locked
APR help
500.0%
advertised≈ 458.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)Daily Volume help
$572.94K
Trailing 24h
My Deposit
AI Verdict
Deploy Capital
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current ANSEM/SOL price, and review or withdraw if the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio remains materially below its current 11.45x baseline for two consecutive daily observations.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 477.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $572.94K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $631.43 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted APR decomposes into 477.9% from swap fees and 22.1% from rewards. 96% of the yield is fee-derived, so current returns depend on trading activity rather than an emissions program. Reward dependency and the remaining reward duration are not established in the supplied data, so the fee APR should be treated as the primary observable yield component.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss data and the share of liquidity currently inside the active range are not available, limiting direct measurement of price divergence and range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, ANSEM-SOL has exposure to abrupt ANSEM price moves, thin or rapidly changing liquidity, and adverse inventory shifts against SOL. Emission decay and exit timing still matter for memecoin pools, although this pool currently reports no reward contribution; an LP should avoid assuming that fee conditions will persist after volume or liquidity changes.
tollANSEM Context
ANSEM is the memecoin side of this pair, and the pool converts its price movement against SOL into changing token inventory for the LP. Liquidity depth for ANSEM outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp ANSEM move can produce difficult rebalancing conditions and impermanent loss even when fee volume is high. Strong ANSEM appreciation generally leaves the LP with less ANSEM than a simple hold, while a sharp decline leaves greater ANSEM exposure.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established asset in the pair and serves as the quote-side reference for ANSEM's price. The supplied metrics do not establish how much SOL liquidity exists elsewhere for this specific market, but SOL volatility still changes the pair price and can move liquidity out of its active range. Relative ANSEM weakness increases the LP's ANSEM inventory while relative strength tends to reduce it.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward the asset that falls in price, so the fee income may not offset losses from ANSEM's price movement.
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ANSEM-SOL liquidity pool on meteora-dlmm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward the asset that falls in price, so the fee income may not offset losses from ANSEM's price movement.
Details
Solana
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4pANrqEvjad4xEghrCbAAJfBm8KyNvYMKk1cuGW8erE4
- Protocol
- meteora-dlmm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- ANSEM (9cRCn9rG…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 7/5/2026
Non-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardFrequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 477.9% in fees and 22.1% in rewards, with 96% of yield coming from fees. Because the reported reward component is absent, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver, but any future incentive program would make the reward portion decline as emissions decay.
The current APR is split between 477.9% in fees and 22.1% in rewards, with 96% of yield coming from fees. Because the reported reward component is absent, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver, but any future incentive program would make the reward portion decline as emissions decay.
The reported reward component is 22.1%, so the current quoted return is already fee-led rather than incentive-led. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the affected portion would disappear and the remaining return would depend on trading fees generated by $573K of volume against $50K of liquidity.
The reported reward component is 22.1%, so the current quoted return is already fee-led rather than incentive-led. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the affected portion would disappear and the remaining return would depend on trading fees generated by $573K of volume against $50K of liquidity.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification and by the possibility of abrupt ANSEM price changes, even though current fee yield is 477.9% and the volume-to-TVL ratio is 11.45x. The supplied data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or active-range history, so the fee rate alone cannot quantify the chance of loss.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification and by the possibility of abrupt ANSEM price changes, even though current fee yield is 477.9% and the volume-to-TVL ratio is 11.45x. The supplied data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or active-range history, so the fee rate alone cannot quantify the chance of loss.
Consider exiting when ANSEM's price movement leaves your planned range, when volume falls persistently from the current 11.45x volume-to-TVL baseline, or when TVL declines enough to make fees unreliable. A falling fee-only return from 477.9% is a more relevant warning here than the loss of a reward stream.
Consider exiting when ANSEM's price movement leaves your planned range, when volume falls persistently from the current 11.45x volume-to-TVL baseline, or when TVL declines enough to make fees unreliable. A falling fee-only return from 477.9% is a more relevant warning here than the loss of a reward stream.
It cannot be estimated reliably from the supplied data because recent impermanent loss and range history are unavailable. Break-even depends on realized fees near 477.9%, future volume relative to $50K, and whether ANSEM's price later returns toward the entry relationship with SOL.
It cannot be estimated reliably from the supplied data because recent impermanent loss and range history are unavailable. Break-even depends on realized fees near 477.9%, future volume relative to $50K, and whether ANSEM's price later returns toward the entry relationship with SOL.
