new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 53/100 places SOL-PNUT in a middle range, while Enter 46/100 / Hold 61/100 / Exit 19/100 and the live verdict HOLD indicate that the current data supports maintaining an existing position more than opening or closing one. Its #37 of 283 ranking among raydium-amm pools is relatively high within that set, but the score is not a claim of low risk: the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool remains dependent on trading fees with limited evidence on recent IL or range behavior. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, fee APR collapse, or materially worse PNUT liquidity would change the assessment toward exit; stronger persistent volume and deeper liquidity could improve the entry case.
Computed 2026-07-13 23:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
TVL help
$2.55M
Total value locked
APR help
2.8%
advertised≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)Daily Volume help
$76.70K
Trailing 24h
My Deposit
AI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a review trigger if the rolling volume-to-TVL ratio remains below 0.03x for several sessions or if PNUT's price moves sharply relative to SOL; at that point, narrow exposure only after checking liquidity, or exit rather than waiting for fee income to offset an unmeasured IL burden.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $76.70K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $191.75 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 2.7% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 99% of the yield comes from trading fees, so realized returns depend on swap volume, fee capture, and the stability of the pool's liquidity base rather than a disclosed reward schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and no time-bound reward horizon is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss performance and the share of liquidity that remained in range are not reported, so the position cannot be assessed from a seven-day IL or range-retention history. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PNUT is exposed to sharp PNUT-SOL price divergence, thin-side liquidity, and rapid changes in trading demand. Emission decay is not currently the main stated risk because the reward component is zero; exit timing should instead account for falling volume, declining liquidity, and abrupt PNUT repricing.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's base asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than PNUT, which generally makes SOL the more liquid side of the pair. For this LP, SOL price movement changes the relative price against PNUT; a large divergence can create impermanent loss even when the pool continues to generate fees.
tollPnut Context
PNUT is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on concentrated venue activity and sentiment than SOL's. A rapid PNUT move against SOL can shift the LP toward the underperforming asset, while a decline in PNUT trading interest can reduce fee generation and make exit execution less reliable.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PNUT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward whichever token has fallen in value, and the memecoin's price and liquidity can change quickly.
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Pnut liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PNUT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward whichever token has fallen in value, and the memecoin's price and liquidity can change quickly.
Details
Solana
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4AZRPNEfCJ7iw28rJu5aUyeQhYcvdcNm8cswyL51AY9i
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Pnut (2qEHjDLD…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Non-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
APR
NaN%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardFrequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 2.7%, so the stated APR is not presently supported by a disclosed emissions stream. If incentives are introduced or later decay, the effect would be visible mainly through a change in 0.0%; fee income would still depend on trading activity.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 2.7%, so the stated APR is not presently supported by a disclosed emissions stream. If incentives are introduced or later decay, the effect would be visible mainly through a change in 0.0%; fee income would still depend on trading activity.
Because the current reward contribution is 0.0% and 99% of yield is fee-funded, an incentive expiry would not remove the currently stated reward component. If future rewards are added before expiring, the remaining return would rely on 2.7% and could fall if trading volume or liquidity also declines.
Because the current reward contribution is 0.0% and 99% of yield is fee-funded, an incentive expiry would not remove the currently stated reward component. If future rewards are added before expiring, the remaining return would rely on 2.7% and could fall if trading volume or liquidity also declines.
The main risks are PNUT's sharp price moves against SOL, changing liquidity, and impermanent loss that cannot be evaluated from a reported seven-day history here. The 0.03x ratio and $2.6M TVL indicate that fee generation should be judged against the pool's relatively limited trading activity rather than treated as guaranteed income.
The main risks are PNUT's sharp price moves against SOL, changing liquidity, and impermanent loss that cannot be evaluated from a reported seven-day history here. The 0.03x ratio and $2.6M TVL indicate that fee generation should be judged against the pool's relatively limited trading activity rather than treated as guaranteed income.
For SOL-PNUT, review an exit when volume stays below the current 0.03x relationship to TVL, liquidity drains, PNUT-SOL divergence accelerates, or fee-only APR falls materially below 2.7%. An exit is also reasonable when the position no longer compensates for the uncertainty around IL and execution risk.
For SOL-PNUT, review an exit when volume stays below the current 0.03x relationship to TVL, liquidity drains, PNUT-SOL divergence accelerates, or fee-only APR falls materially below 2.7%. An exit is also reasonable when the position no longer compensates for the uncertainty around IL and execution risk.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee income varies with volume. In principle, break-even depends on cumulative realized fees from 2.7% overcoming the position's price-divergence loss; 2.8% should not be treated as a guaranteed annual recovery rate.
There is no reliable fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is not reported and fee income varies with volume. In principle, break-even depends on cumulative realized fees from 2.7% overcoming the position's price-divergence loss; 2.8% should not be treated as a guaranteed annual recovery rate.
